Download Attacking Faulty Reasoning: Practical Guide to Fallacy-Free Arguments, 5th Edition, by T. Edward Damer
Attacking Faulty Reasoning: Practical Guide To Fallacy-Free Arguments, 5th Edition, By T. Edward Damer. Learning to have reading habit is like learning to attempt for eating something that you truly do not want. It will need even more times to help. Additionally, it will certainly also little bit make to offer the food to your mouth and swallow it. Well, as checking out a book Attacking Faulty Reasoning: Practical Guide To Fallacy-Free Arguments, 5th Edition, By T. Edward Damer, often, if you ought to check out something for your brand-new tasks, you will certainly really feel so woozy of it. Also it is a book like Attacking Faulty Reasoning: Practical Guide To Fallacy-Free Arguments, 5th Edition, By T. Edward Damer; it will certainly make you feel so bad.
Attacking Faulty Reasoning: Practical Guide to Fallacy-Free Arguments, 5th Edition, by T. Edward Damer
Download Attacking Faulty Reasoning: Practical Guide to Fallacy-Free Arguments, 5th Edition, by T. Edward Damer
Schedule Attacking Faulty Reasoning: Practical Guide To Fallacy-Free Arguments, 5th Edition, By T. Edward Damer is among the precious well worth that will make you consistently abundant. It will not suggest as abundant as the money provide you. When some individuals have absence to deal with the life, people with lots of publications sometimes will certainly be better in doing the life. Why should be e-book Attacking Faulty Reasoning: Practical Guide To Fallacy-Free Arguments, 5th Edition, By T. Edward Damer It is in fact not suggested that book Attacking Faulty Reasoning: Practical Guide To Fallacy-Free Arguments, 5th Edition, By T. Edward Damer will certainly offer you power to reach every little thing. Guide is to review as well as exactly what we implied is guide that is checked out. You can likewise see how the publication entitles Attacking Faulty Reasoning: Practical Guide To Fallacy-Free Arguments, 5th Edition, By T. Edward Damer and varieties of e-book collections are providing below.
Why should be book Attacking Faulty Reasoning: Practical Guide To Fallacy-Free Arguments, 5th Edition, By T. Edward Damer Book is among the easy sources to look for. By getting the writer as well as style to get, you could locate so many titles that offer their information to get. As this Attacking Faulty Reasoning: Practical Guide To Fallacy-Free Arguments, 5th Edition, By T. Edward Damer, the inspiring publication Attacking Faulty Reasoning: Practical Guide To Fallacy-Free Arguments, 5th Edition, By T. Edward Damer will give you what you have to cover the task deadline. As well as why should be in this web site? We will certainly ask first, have you much more times to opt for shopping the books and also hunt for the referred publication Attacking Faulty Reasoning: Practical Guide To Fallacy-Free Arguments, 5th Edition, By T. Edward Damer in publication store? Lots of people could not have sufficient time to discover it.
For this reason, this website provides for you to cover your trouble. We show you some referred publications Attacking Faulty Reasoning: Practical Guide To Fallacy-Free Arguments, 5th Edition, By T. Edward Damer in all kinds and styles. From typical writer to the well-known one, they are all covered to supply in this site. This Attacking Faulty Reasoning: Practical Guide To Fallacy-Free Arguments, 5th Edition, By T. Edward Damer is you're looked for publication; you just have to go to the web link page to show in this site and afterwards choose downloading and install. It will certainly not take often times to get one publication Attacking Faulty Reasoning: Practical Guide To Fallacy-Free Arguments, 5th Edition, By T. Edward Damer It will depend on your net link. Simply purchase and download the soft file of this book Attacking Faulty Reasoning: Practical Guide To Fallacy-Free Arguments, 5th Edition, By T. Edward Damer
It is so easy, right? Why don't you try it? In this website, you can also find various other titles of the Attacking Faulty Reasoning: Practical Guide To Fallacy-Free Arguments, 5th Edition, By T. Edward Damer book collections that might have the ability to help you discovering the very best solution of your task. Reading this book Attacking Faulty Reasoning: Practical Guide To Fallacy-Free Arguments, 5th Edition, By T. Edward Damer in soft file will additionally reduce you to obtain the source quickly. You might not bring for those publications to someplace you go. Just with the gadget that constantly be with your all over, you can read this book Attacking Faulty Reasoning: Practical Guide To Fallacy-Free Arguments, 5th Edition, By T. Edward Damer So, it will be so swiftly to finish reading this Attacking Faulty Reasoning: Practical Guide To Fallacy-Free Arguments, 5th Edition, By T. Edward Damer
Not only is ATTACKING FAULTY REASONING the most comprehensive, readable, and theoretically sound book on the common fallacies, it is also a well-designed primer for the construction and evaluation of arguments. Addressing over 60 fallacies and featuring a wealth of timely examples and exercises, this text will help students hone their skills in rational, argumentative discussion.
- Sales Rank: #1067953 in Books
- Brand: Brand: Wadsworth Publishing
- Published on: 2004-02-26
- Original language: English
- Number of items: 1
- Dimensions: .52" h x 6.46" w x 9.16" l,
- Binding: Paperback
- 240 pages
- Used Book in Good Condition
About the Author
T. Edward Damer received his Ph.D. from Boston University and currently teaches at Emory and Henry College.
Most helpful customer reviews
52 of 55 people found the following review helpful.
I like what he's trying to do, but he doesn't do it very well
By Jeffrey W. Heikkinen
I like the *idea* of this book - the book it *could* be, if you will - very much. But actually using it to teach a critical thinking course last year revealed serious flaws.
According to the ad copy and the first chapter or so, the overall goal is to present a coherent theory of argumentation, and of fallacies as failures to meet the obligations that theory imposes. A good argument has feature X, while a deviation from X is a type of fallacy, basically. This is a good idea for a way to structure a critical thinking textbook, and particularly for a way to work the fallacies into it so that they don't feel like an afterthought. Another feature I liked was the incorporation of that theory of argument into a larger theory of argumentative *conduct*, where we have obligations, not just to do our best to make our arguments as good as possible, but to be charitable and fair-minded toward our opponents as well. This is a point that needs to be stressed in any CT course and it's very good that Damer makes sure to do so at the outset.
However, the book has a number of serious flaws. For one thing, the "theory" of argumentation it's supposedly built around really isn't. The theory is little more than a list of five features a good argument should have (except when it doesn't; the Structural criterion doesn't apply to all arguments, at least not in a uniform way). Actually, more like eight features or so, since some of his five criteria are themselves bundles of distinct, only loosely related concepts. The reader expecting Damer to tie these features together in some way - to tell us what it is they have in common that allows them to play this role - is going to be disappointed; there is no serious, non-circular attempt to do this. Perhaps the average first-year student using this as a textbook wouldn't notice this, or wouldn't care, but it made teaching this book far less satisfying than I had hoped.
I wish to discuss three other notable flaws, each arguably less deep, but more pedagogically significant. First of all, many of the examples - both of types of fallacy, and of specific (supposed) instances of fallacies - simply aren't arguments, fallacious or otherwise. Not every instance of ambiguity, rationalization, misuse of a principle or wishful thinking involves an argument, but Damer sometimes uses a very large and unwieldy sledgehammer to make them look as though they do Similarly, several of Damer's specific examples, such as the landlord on page 200, refer to things as arguments that simply aren't (in this case the landlord's "argument" is better described as an explanation). In teaching a critical thinking class, it is of the first importance that students learn to distinguish between arguments and other bits of language, especially explanations, that are not arguments. Stronger students will understand the distinction intuitively but I found many of my students last year to be very ill-served by Damer in this regard. When I switched to Govier this past summer, the proportion of my students who consistently had problems distinguishing arguments from explanations dropped - I kid you not - from about 50% to *ZERO*.
Another very serious problem concerns Damer's explanation of Aristotelean categorical logic. Traditionally, the I statement ("Some S are P") is defined as meaning that at least one S is also a P, and similarly the O statement ("Some S are not P") as "At least one S is not a P". Damer, on the other hand, defines the I statement as meaning at least one S is a P *but not all of them are*, and similarly for the O statement. But then the I statement means "there's at least one S that's a P, and at least one that isn't" and so does the O statement; therefore, by Damer's definitions, the two are exactly equivalent! But Damer goes on to explain the traditional logical properties of the two, which are quite different, blissfully unaware that he's erased the distinction between them. As anyone who knows this material will quickly realize, this implies many logical absurdities, such as that "All S are P" and "No S are P" are equivalent (the "proof" of this, using the traditional rules of immediate inference plus Damer's inadvertent equation of the I and O statements, is very easy and left as an exercise for the reader). Getting something like this wrong is a recipe for confusing, not helping, the thinking of one's students.
The final problem I will mention lies with the title and emphasis of the book. Despite starting on the right foot, with an emphasis on mutual respect and intellectual honesty, the fact that most of the book is devoted to fallacies, combined with the title, creates an undesirable emphasis on finding fault with one's opponents rather than searching for common ground. Damer warns against this approach several times, but those warnings fly in the face of the message the title and overall contents of the book send. The current state of public discourse demands that books like this do all they can to discourage this approach, but instead Damer, at best, sends mixed messages on this point.
Add to this the problems with some of the examples that even the positive reviews acknowledge and you have a textbook that lays claim to some admirable ambitions, but doesn't live up to them and has some serious problems from a pedagogical standpoint into the bargain. Factor in its expense and you can do a very great deal better. As mentioned above, I switched to Trudy Govier's outstanding, albeit even pricier, A Practical Study of Argument, and got much better results in every way. For one thing, though Govier doesn't trumpet the fact the way Damer does, she is at least as successful as Damer (not that that's setting the bar very high) in building a genuine *system* of informal logic - and isn't that supposed to be Damer's main selling point?
27 of 27 people found the following review helpful.
Invaluble for everyday life, not just the classroom...
By Erik Anschicks
Although I gathered that this book was written primarily as a text for logic and critical thinking courses, it helped me immensely in terms of learning how to make sense of argumentative quality in everyday life, not only the classroom. I did not read this book for a class as I have graduated college, but I found it to be a real help in determining the strengths and weaknesses in arguments and other forms of persuasive speech that we encounter daily.
The book uses clear and familiar everyday examples to make the points, instead of presenting things in an abstract and think-tank way, and most people will find themselves realizing that they have had arguments or debates exactly like those described in the book. The book clearly demonstrates how much reason and critical thinking can be diminished or overlooked by laziness or unwillingness on the part of people to care enough to think well.
The chapters follow a clear course and almost every logical fallacy I have ever encountered in the classroom or the real world is covered in the book. It explains the fallacy, gives examples, and shows how to expose the fallacy for being a poor argument, as well as demonstrating ways to combat and point out to the other person (in a nice way) the flaw in the reasoning. The tone of the book is pleasently informal, as it attempts to create familiar dialouge and situations to which the reader can easily identify. I highly reccommend the book and think that anyone who cares enough to want to think more maturely would benefit greatly.
34 of 34 people found the following review helpful.
The antidote for contradiction and controversy.
By Stanley D. Williams, PhD
Damer pulls off a next to impossible task-naming, describing, exampling, and attacking 60 fallacies while structuring them neatly within four criteria of a good argument: relevance, acceptability, sufficient grounds and rebuttal. The last chapter discusses the specifics of "A Code of Conduct for Effective Rational Discussion." I used this test as a key element of my Ph.D. research and continue to use it in my later work. This should be required study for every politician and philosopher. A simpler version should be required study for every middle school and high school student. Discovering what is true would be so much easier with good arguments absence of fallacy. Be the first to rid your "neighborhood" of polemics. Study this book.
Attacking Faulty Reasoning: Practical Guide to Fallacy-Free Arguments, 5th Edition, by T. Edward Damer PDF
Attacking Faulty Reasoning: Practical Guide to Fallacy-Free Arguments, 5th Edition, by T. Edward Damer EPub
Attacking Faulty Reasoning: Practical Guide to Fallacy-Free Arguments, 5th Edition, by T. Edward Damer Doc
Attacking Faulty Reasoning: Practical Guide to Fallacy-Free Arguments, 5th Edition, by T. Edward Damer iBooks
Attacking Faulty Reasoning: Practical Guide to Fallacy-Free Arguments, 5th Edition, by T. Edward Damer rtf
Attacking Faulty Reasoning: Practical Guide to Fallacy-Free Arguments, 5th Edition, by T. Edward Damer Mobipocket
Attacking Faulty Reasoning: Practical Guide to Fallacy-Free Arguments, 5th Edition, by T. Edward Damer Kindle
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar